
For many people today, the resurrection of Jesus Christ is a seemingly insignificant point of Christian doctrine. They think it does not matter whether Jesus was raised from the dead or not, what matters is that He lived a good life. But it should be pointed out that that is not the position of the Bible [1] and that is not the position of Christian scholars down throughout history. Consider the following quotations.
W. J. Sparrow-Simpson:
If the Resurrection is not historic fact, then
the power of death remains unbroken . . . and accordingly believers are yet in
their sins, precisely where they were before they heard of Jesus' name.
[2]
H. P. Liddon:
Faith in the resurrection is the very keystone
of the arch of Christian faith, and, when it is removed, all must inevitably
crumble into ruin.
[3]
R. M'Cheyne Edgar:
Here is a teacher of religion and He calmly professes
to stake His entire claims upon His ability, after having been done to death,
to rise again from the grave. We
may safely assume that there never was, before or since, such a proposal made .
. . He who was ready to stake everything on his ability to come back from the
tomb stands before us as the most original of all teachers, one who shines in
His own self-evidencing life!
[4]
B. B. Warfield:
Christ Himself deliberately staked His whole claim to
the credit of men upon His resurrection. When asked for a sign He pointed to this
sign as His single and sufficient credential.
[5]
John Locke:
Our Savior’s resurrection . . . is truly of
great importance in Christianity; so great that His being or not being the
Messiah stands or falls with it: so that these two important articles are
inseparable and in effect make one. For since that time, believe one and you believe both; deny one of them,
and you can believe neither.
[6]
Philip Schaff:
The resurrection of Christ is therefore emphatically a
test question upon which depends the truth or
falsehood of the Christian religion. It is either the greatest miracle or the greatest delusion which history
records.
[7]
Theadosus Harnack:
To
me Christianity stands or falls with the Resurrection.
[8]
The resurrection is essential to Christianity. In fact, the resurrection is Christianity.
So we should take some time to understand what it was like. What do we mean when we say that Jesus rose from the dead? How did He rise? What did it look like? Where did it happen? Who saw it? All these are important questions to ask and this article will answer them by looking at five aspects of the resurrection.
1. The Tomb Was New. John 19:38-42 explains what happened to Jesus' body after He was crucified.
After these things Joseph of Arimathea,
being a disciple of Jesus, but a secret one for fear of the Jews, asked Pilate
that he might take away the body of Jesus; and Pilate granted permission. So he came and took away His body. Nicodemus, who had first come to Him by
night, also came, bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pounds
weight. So they took the body of
Jesus and bound it in linen wrappings with the spices, as is the burial custom
of the Jews.
Now in that place where He was crucified there was a garden, and in the garden
a new tomb in which no one had yet been laid. Therefore because of the Jewish day of
preparation, since the tomb was nearby, they laid Jesus there.
Several ancient tombs exist in
- a cave-like entrance is built into the side of a hill
- a 4 foot tall, 1 ton stone is seen next to the entrance; it is round and is placed into a groove where it can be rolled back and forth to prevent grave robbers and wild animals from getting inside the tomb
- above and around the stone is nothing but solid rock; the only way into and out of the tomb is the one entrance
- once inside the tomb, the first room contains two slabs cut into the rock, one on each side of the doorway; these were used to lay a corpse on once it was brought into the tomb
- further into the tomb, the second room contains several 2 x 1 foot holes close to the ground called ossuaries where the bones were laid after the body had decomposed on the stone slab
- the bones would stay in the ossuaries indefinitely; thus the Jews could have "family tombs" even [9]
According to the description in the Gospels, [10] Jesus must have been buried in a tomb like this one.
But the interesting thing about this is that it was
extremely rare for someone in this time period to be buried in a new tomb. Because they were cut out of solid rock,
tombs like this one cost a lot of money to build and people typically shared
that cost with members of their own family. Many First Century Jews, rich and poor
alike, were buried in tombs that had been used for centuries and were full of
[11]
Yet John
This is even more interesting when you consider how Jesus
died. Crucified men were typically
[12]
and they were buried in a very shameful manner.
[13]
Crucifixion was a death of disgrace and
embarrassment. Yet Jesus was laid
in a new tomb and John
In all the history of the world, Jesus may have been the only man who was crucified and given this type of treatment afterwards. He was put to death with wicked men but [15] He was crucified between two criminals [16] but He was placed in a brand new tomb. And when He rose from the grave, His tomb really was empty. No one had ever used it before. There was no question as to whether He left the tomb because it was empty when His body was put into it. His corpse was the first and the only one to rest there.
2. The Body Was Gone. Mark 16:1-6 explains what happened next,
When the Sabbath was over, Mary Magdalene, and Mary
the mother of James, and Salome, bought spices, so that they might come and
anoint Him. Very early on the first day of the week,
they came to the tomb when the sun had risen. They were saying to one another,
"Who will roll away the stone for us from the entrance of the
tomb?"
Looking up, they saw that the stone had been rolled
away, although it was extremely large. Entering the tomb, they saw a young man sitting at the right, wearing a
white robe; and they were amazed. And he said to them, "Do not be amazed; you are looking for Jesus
the Nazarene, who has been crucified. He has risen; He is not here; behold, here is
the place where they laid Him."
After Jesus' arrest, His disciples went into hiding for fear [17] So the women, Mary Magdalene, Mary the [18] and to pay their respects to the Lord. When they arrived at the tomb, they noticed that the stone had been moved This would usually indicate robbery, [19] but the women were naturally curious and wanted to see what had happened. When they entered the tomb, they found that Jesus' body was gone and that there was a young man sitting on the stone [20] He told them that Jesus had resurrected.
Mark 16:8 gives the women's response to all of this,
They went out and fled from the tomb, for trembling
and astonishment had gripped them; and they said nothing to anyone, for they
were afraid.
That must have been an understatement. The dead body of Jesus is missing and an angel has just spoken to them. The physical and mental states of these women must have been in a very fragile condition at this point in the story. And that is exactly what Mark records. The three ladies leave the tomb trembling and afraid and "they said nothing to anyone."
But the Apostles John and Peter later arrive and proceed to take a closer look inside the tomb.
3. The Graveclothes Were Undisturbed.
John 20:1-9 tells us what they saw,
Now on the first day of the week Mary Magdalene
came early to the tomb, while it was still dark, and saw the stone already
taken away from the tomb. So she
ran and came to Simon Peter and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved, and
said to them, "They have taken away the Lord out of the tomb, and we do
not know where they have laid Him."
[21]
So Peter and the other disciple
[22]
went forth, and they were going to the tomb. The two were running together; and the
other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter and came to the tomb first; and
stooping and looking in, he saw the linen wrappings lying there; but he did not
go in. And so Simon Peter also
came, following him, and entered the tomb; and he saw the linen wrappings lying
there, and the face-cloth which had been on His head, not lying with the linen
wrappings, but rolled up in a place by itself.
So the other disciple
who had first come to the tomb then also entered, and he saw and believed. For as yet they did not
understand the Scripture, that He must rise again from
the dead.
The Apostle John gives us several helpful insights into the resurrection in this passage. In verse 5, John saw strips of linen lying on the stone slab where Jesus' body would have been. In verse 6, Peter sees the same thing. In verse 7, the burial cloth for Jesus' head is left separate from the burial cloth for Jesus' body. And verse 8 goes on to say, "So the other disciple who had first come to the tomb then also entered, and he saw and believed."
What did John believe? Did he believe that the body was stolen? There was probably no sense in recording that because anyone would have believed that.
He believed that [23] He did not believe it because of the Scriptures, which verse 9 explains, "For as yet they did not understand the Scripture, that He must rise again from the dead." John believed Jesus had resurrected because of what he saw.
What did he see? What made him think that Jesus had resurrected? The graveclothes.
Verse 7 says that the face-cloth was separate from the linen wrappings that would have held Jesus' body. Grave robbers would not have left things this way. Grave robbers would not have taken the time to undress Jesus' body and place the clothing exactly as it was when His corpse was in it. They would have been in a hurry and they would have left a mess if they left anything at all. Chances are they would have taken the linen along with the rest of the body.
The Apostle John knew this. And because of that, he concluded that Jesus' body was not stolen; it was resurrected. Jesus passed from one state of existence into another and, when He did, He simply left the grave clothes as they were. The clothes stayed on the slab where Jesus' body was laid. The head piece stayed at the head. The body piece stayed where the body was. The burial shroud stayed put as if a body was still in it because of all the spices and oils. And when John saw things this way, he believed.
To quote John Stott at length:
Let us try to reconstruct the story. John tells us (19:38-42) that while
Joseph begged Pilate for the body of Jesus, Nicodemus ‘came bring a
mixture of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pounds’ weight.’ Then together they ‘took the body
of Jesus, and bound it in linen cloths with the spices, as is the burial custom
of the Jews.’ That is to say,
as they wound the linen ‘bandages’ round His body, they sprinkled the powdered spices into the folds. A separate cloth will have been used for
His head. They thus enswathed His
body and head, leaving His face and neck bare, according to oriental
custom. They then laid the body on
a stone slab which had been hewn out of the side of the cave-tomb.
Now supposing we had been present in the sepulcher
when the resurrection of Jesus actually took place. What
should we have seen? Should we have
seen Jesus begin to move, and then yawn and stretch and get up? No. We do not believe that He returned to this life. He did not recover from a swoon. He died, and He rose again. His was a resurrection, not a resuscitation. We believe that He passed miraculously from death into an altogether new
sphere of existence. What then
should we have seen, had we been there? We should suddenly have noticed that the body disappeared. It would have ‘vaporized,’
being transmuted into something new and different and wonderful. It would have passed through the graveclothes, as it was later to pass through closed doors,
leaving them untouched and almost undisturbed. Almost but not quite.
For the body cloths, under the weight of 100 lbs. of
spices, once the support of the body had been removed, would have subsided or
collapsed, and would now be lying flat. A gap would have appeared between the body cloths and the head napkin,
where His face and neck had been. And the napkin itself, because of the complicated criss-cross
pattern of the bandages, might well have retained its concave shape, a crumpled
turban, but with no head inside it.
A careful study of the text of John’s narrative
suggests that it is just these three characteristics of the discarded graveclothes which he saw. First, he saw the cloths
‘lying.’ The word is
repeated twice, and the first time it is placed in an emphatic position in the
Greek sentence. We might translate,
‘He saw, as they were lying (or ‘collapsed’), the linen
cloths.’ Next, the head napkin was ‘not . . . with the linen cloths
but . . . in a place by itself.’ This is unlikely to mean it had been bundled up and tossed in a
corner. It lay still on the stone
slab, but was separated from the body cloths by a noticeable space. Third, this same napkin was ‘not
lying . . . but wrapped together . . .’ This last word has been
translated “twirled.” The word aptly describes the rounded shape
the empty napkin still preserved.
It is not hard to imagine the site which greeted the
eyes of the apostles when they reached the tomb: the stone slab, the collapsed graveclothes, the shell of the head-cloth and the gap
between the two. No wonder they
‘saw and believed.’ A
glance at these graveclothes proved the reality, and
indicated the nature of the resurrection. They had been neither touched nor folded nor manipulate by any human
being. They were like a discarded
[cocoon] from which the butterfly had emerged.
[24]
And all of this leads us to a fourth aspect of the resurrection.
4. Jesus' Body Was Transformed. It is important to mention here that, when Jesus rose from the dead, He did not so much rise as He transformed. His body transformed from an earthly body to a resurrected body. He rose in the sense that He came back to life but He did not rise in the sense that He literally sat up.
He did not come back to life in His old earthly body; He came back to life in a new heavenly body.
Matthew 28:2 says that on Sunday morning after Jesus' crucifixion, "A severe earthquake had occurred, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven and came and rolled away the stone and sat upon it." Why did the angel move the stone instead of Jesus? What kept the Lord from rolling it away? The answer: Nothing. Jesus did not move the stone because Jesus did not need to. He could have gotten out of the tomb whether the stone moved or not.
After the resurrection, Jesus appeared to His disciples whenever He wanted to,
regardless of the physical barriers. Luke 24:30-37 says that after Jesus had finished visiting with two of
His disciples on the road to Emmaus,
When He had reclined at the table with them, He took
the bread and blessed it, and breaking it, He began giving it to them. Then their eyes were opened and they
recognized Him; and He vanished from their sight. They said to one another, "Were not
our hearts burning within us while He was speaking to us on the road, while He
was explaining the Scriptures to us?"
And they got up that very hour and returned to
While they were telling these things, He Himself stood
in their midst and said to them, "Peace be to you." But they were startled and frightened
and thought they were seeing a spirit.
Jesus disappeared right in front of their eyes and Jesus
reappeared right in front of their eyes. John
So when it was evening on that day, the first day of
the week, and when the doors were shut where the disciples were, for fear of
the Jews, Jesus came and stood in their midst and said to them, "Peace be
with you."
Locked doors could not keep Jesus out of a room because His new body could come and go as it pleased.
Make no mistake about it, the stone was not moved so Jesus could get out. The stone was moved so the disciples could get in. Jesus did not need the stone moved because His new body was not bound by the limitations of the old one. The stone could no more have His resurrected body was perfect and limitless. [25]
5. Jesus' Body Was Recognizable. In Luke 24:30-37 and John 20:19, Jesus' disciples recognized Him. His new body was resembled the old one. In fact, the old one was not thrown away; it was raised from the dead. In John 20:27, it even says that the new resurrected body still contained some of the scars from Jesus' earthly life.
Then He said to Thomas, "Reach here with your
finger, and see My hands; and reach here your hand and
put it into My side; and do not be unbelieving, but believing.
A great example of someone noticing Jesus in His resurrected body is found in John 20:11-16,
But Mary was standing outside the tomb weeping; and
so, as she wept, she stooped and looked into the tomb; and she saw two angels
in white sitting, one at the head and one at the feet, where the body of Jesus
had been lying. And they said to
her, "Woman, why are you weeping?" She said to them, "Because they
have taken away my Lord, and I do not know where they have laid Him."
When she had said this, she turned around and saw
Jesus standing there, and did not know that it was Jesus. Jesus said to her, "Woman, why are
you weeping? Whom are you
seeking?" Supposing Him to be
the gardener, she said to Him, "Sir, if you have carried Him away, tell me
where you have laid Him, and I will take Him away."
Jesus said to her, "Mary!" She turned around and said to Him in
Hebrew, "Rabboni!" (which means, Teacher).
Although it took her a minute (because she thought He was dead), Mary could identify the risen Lord. His body was still the same, although it was different. It was recognizable.
Conclusion
It is vital to our Christian growth to understand what
Jesus' resurrection looked like. In
fact, Philippians 3:20-21 says,
For our citizenship is in heaven, from which also we
eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ; who will transform the body
of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory.
In order to understand our future resurrection, we must understand Jesus' past resurrection because He will transform our bodies to be like His. We cannot know what will happen to us if we do not understand what has happened to Him. It is my prayer that this article would help you to do that so that you can look forward to the day when
. . . we will not all sleep,
but we will be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last
trumpet; for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable,
and we will be changed. For this perishable must put on the imperishable, and this mortal
must put on immortality. But
when this perishable will have put on the imperishable, and this mortal will
have put on immortality, then will come about the
saying that is written, "Death is swallowed up in victory."
"O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?"
[26]
[2]
Quoted in Josh McDowell's Evidence
that Demands a Verdict: Historical Evidences of the Christian Faith (Campus
Crusade for Christ, Inc., 1972) 188.
[9]
The
source of these details is the author's study trip to
[11]
John
D. Davis,
[12]
Merrill F. Unger, Unger's Bible
Dictionary (Chicago: Moody Press, 1966). Merrill Unger writes this about the
duration of crucifixion,
If the nailing was the most painful mode in the first instance the other was more so in the end, for the sufferer was left to die of sheer exhaustion, and when simply bound with thongs, it might take days to accomplish the process; for usually a strong pin projected out of the central stem, on which the body of the sufferer rested. Instances are on record of persons surviving [crucifixion] for nine days (229).
[13]
Merrill C. Tenney, The Gospel of John in The Expositor's Bible Commentary, ed. by Frank
E. Gaebelein (Grand Rapids: Zondervan,
1981). Tenney describes the shameful treatment that Jesus' body would have endured if Joseph
and Nicodemus had not stepped in.
Burial in the
[14]
Colin
G. Kruse, John in The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, ed. by Leon
Morris (
[19]
R.
Alan Cole, Mark in The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, ed. by Leon Morris
(Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1989) 330.
[21]
John MacArthur, John 12-21 in The MacArthur new Testament Commentary (
Thus Mary, running to find Peter and John, was not present at the tomb when the angels appeared to the others and announced Christ's resurrection. She then returned alone to the tomb, saw the angels, and met the risen Lord (368).
[22]
Ancient authors did not give their own names when telling a story. Nowhere in the Gospel of John does John
call himself by name but he makes several references to himself using phrases
like "the other disciple" or "the disciple whom Jesus
loved." See Jn 13:23;
[23]
A. T.
Robertson, The Fourth Gospel in Word Pictures in the
New Testament, Volume V (Nashville, Tenn.: Broadman Press, 1960).
Peter saw more after he entered than John did in his first glance, but John saw into the meaning of it all better than Peter. Peter had more sight, John more insight. John was the first to believe that Jesus was risen from the tomb even before he saw him . . . John was evidently proud to be able to record this great moment when he believed without seeing in contrast to Thomas (310).
©2010 justthesimpletruth
design by
djn